The fast evolution of GAI requires us to re-think the way we teach and the way we ask students to acquire, internalize, and create knowledge. A modern education requires students to focus on the process of their work as consumers and disseminators of knowledge. Ubiquitous technologies that can both help and hinder a student's educational experience demand that educators re-think how they teach, and what they ask students to accomplish.
Like any new technology, GAI can be unethically manipulated, and to combat this, educators must create assignments that minimize the potential for cheating. One proven way to do this is to tap into students' intrinsic motivation. Assignment prompts that do not have fixed answers and require students to engage deeply with content are most likely to discourage them from cheating. On this page are some strategies you can use to design courses and craft prompts that encourage genuine engagement and discourage cheating, with or without incorporating GAI.
Page Contents:
GAI can be used successfully to enhance classroom teaching and learning, and reduce time spent on routine tasks.
How Faculty Can Work with GAI
Allowing Students to Work with GAI
Assignments and classroom exercises can be created to complement GAI. Conversely, unauthorized use of GAI can be prevented with prompts that require critical thinking and personal creativity. Whether or not you incorporate GAI in a given assignment, it can be useful to think in terms of Bloom's Taxonomy, which models domains of complexity in critical thinking. Whereas lower-order actions in Bloom's Taxonomy such as "define," "explain," and "describe" can make it easier for students to cheat, higher order actions, when used to create assignments that pair with library resources and personal and classroom experiences, can make cheating more difficult. Higher order action terms include:
Prompt Types
Some of the following examples of prompt types that can either minimize use of GAI or work with it were generated with ChatGPT (2023, August):
Additional Prompt Types with UMass Global Examples
Here are additional prompt types along with assignment examples provided by UMass Global faculty. When fed into a generator, questions that ask students to reflect on personal values and ethics will usually provide general definitions of key terms along with "listicle" style responses such as those found on self-help guides, but usually will not articulate an answer that adequately addresses the prompt.
The background colors in the boxes below were selected by asking ChatGPT for the hex codes for light background colors.
Thought Experiments: Present a hypothetical situation and ask students to explore the implications, consequences, and/or ethical considerations. For example:
Personal Connection: Ask students to relate the topic to personal experiences, interests, or goals. For example:
Self-Reflection: Reflect on one's own experiences, opinions, or perspectives. For example:
Feedback Loop: Ask students to provide feedback on GAI-generated responses to a complicated theory or scenario. For example:
Journaling: Ask students to respond to course readings or learning activities. For example:
Note: We are a fully virtual library and do not have a physical location. Below is our address for administrative purposes:
UMass Global Administration
65 Enterprise, Suite 150
Aliso Viejo, CA 92656